Functionally, no. A fan buying entries with a card through the Wert widget is still paying consideration — it just passes through a regulated fiat-on-ramp before reaching the campaign. Wert handles its own KYC/AML on the cardholder.
The only legal difference is the audit trail:
- Card → USDC (Wert path): KYC'd by Wert. Dollar value is fixed at Wert quote time. Chargeback risk exists through the card network.
- USDC direct (MetaMask path): no Wert KYC. Self-custody. No chargeback.
Both paths feed the same campaign entry pool. Both are equally subject to AMOE.